Старт 2-го турнира с призовым фондом $100,000 ⚫️

Забираем 9 лучших промтов: 1. PROMPT 1 — The Contradiction Finder Most researchers miss this. This prompt doesn't: "Across all papers uploaded, identify every point where two or more authors directly contradict each other. For each contradiction: - State both positions - Name the papers - Explain WHY they likely disagree (methodology, dataset, era) Format as a table." 2. PROMPT 2 - The Citation Chain "Pick the 3 most-cited concepts across these papers. For each concept: - Who introduced it first? - Who challenged it? - Who refined it? - What's the current consensus (if any)? Show me the intellectual lineage like a family tree." This one alone saves 6 hours of backward citation digging. 3. PROMPT 3 - The Intake Protocol Use this when you first upload your papers: "I'm going to share [X] papers on [topic]. Before I ask anything, do this: 1. List every paper by author + year + core claim in one sentence 2. Group them into clusters of shared assumptions 3. Flag any paper that contradicts another Don't summarize. Map the landscape." 4. PROMPT 4 - The Master Synthesis Once you've run the above prompts, hit this one: "You now have a full picture of this literature. Write a synthesis that does NOT summarize individual papers. Instead: - State what the field collectively believes - State what remains contested - State what's been proven beyond reasonable doubt - End with the single most important unanswered question Max 400 words. No filler." 5. PROMPT 5 - The Gap Scanner This is where it gets scary good: "Based on all uploaded papers, identify the 5 research questions that NOBODY has fully answered yet. For each gap: - Why does it exist? (too hard, too niche, overlooked?) - Which existing paper came closest to answering it? - What methodology would be needed to close it?" 6. PROMPT 6 - The Methodology Audit "Compare the research methodologies used across all papers. Group by: surveys, experiments, simulations, meta-analyses, case studies. Then flag: - Which methodology dominates this field and why? - Which methodology is underused? - Which paper's methodology is weakest and why?" 7. PROMPT 7 - The Knowledge Map Builder "Create a structured knowledge map of this entire literature. Format: - Central claim the field orbits around - 3-5 supporting pillars (well-established sub-claims) - 2-3 contested zones (active debates) - 1-2 frontier questions (nobody's solved yet) - 3 papers a newcomer MUST read first and why Output as a clean outline, not prose." Print this. Pin it above your desk. 8. PROMPT 8 - The "So What" Test Run this last. Every time. "Pretend I have to explain this entire body of research to a smart non-expert in 5 minutes. Give me: 1. The one-sentence version of what this field has proven 2. The one honest admission of what it still doesn't know 3. The single real-world implication that matters most No jargon. No hedging. No academic throat-clearing." 9. PROMPT 9 - The Assumption Killer "List every assumption that the MAJORITY of these papers share but never explicitly test or justify. For each assumption: - State it clearly - Name 1-2 papers that rely on it most - Explain what would happen to the field if the assumption turned out to be wrong" This is how paradigm-shifting papers get written. Сохраняем. будь в тренде