![Изображение канала: грязный базар [грязин и крипта]](https://content.desigram.ru/avatar/0db50f84-fedb-4edb-b8f2-9bd47d98cd9e.jpg)
Становимся богами исследований — Claude разберёт для вас десятки научных статей на структурированные выводы, как исследователь уровня Стэнфорда.
Забираем 9 лучших промтов:
1. PROMPT 1 — The Contradiction Finder
Most researchers miss this. This prompt doesn't:
"Across all papers uploaded, identify every point where two
or more authors directly contradict each other.
For each contradiction:
- State both positions
- Name the papers
- Explain WHY they likely disagree (methodology, dataset, era)
Format as a table."
2. PROMPT 2 - The Citation Chain
"Pick the 3 most-cited concepts across these papers.
For each concept:
- Who introduced it first?
- Who challenged it?
- Who refined it?
- What's the current consensus (if any)?
Show me the intellectual lineage like a family tree."
This one alone saves 6 hours of backward citation digging.
3. PROMPT 3 - The Intake Protocol
Use this when you first upload your papers:
"I'm going to share [X] papers on [topic].
Before I ask anything, do this:
1. List every paper by author + year + core claim in one sentence
2. Group them into clusters of shared assumptions
3. Flag any paper that contradicts another
Don't summarize. Map the landscape."
4. PROMPT 4 - The Master Synthesis
Once you've run the above prompts, hit this one:
"You now have a full picture of this literature.
Write a synthesis that does NOT summarize individual papers.
Instead:
- State what the field collectively believes
- State what remains contested
- State what's been proven beyond reasonable doubt
- End with the single most important unanswered question
Max 400 words. No filler."
5. PROMPT 5 - The Gap Scanner
This is where it gets scary good:
"Based on all uploaded papers, identify the 5 research
questions that NOBODY has fully answered yet.
For each gap:
- Why does it exist? (too hard, too niche, overlooked?)
- Which existing paper came closest to answering it?
- What methodology would be needed to close it?"
6. PROMPT 6 - The Methodology Audit
"Compare the research methodologies used across all papers.
Group by: surveys, experiments, simulations, meta-analyses,
case studies.
Then flag:
- Which methodology dominates this field and why?
- Which methodology is underused?
- Which paper's methodology is weakest and why?"
7. PROMPT 7 - The Knowledge Map Builder
"Create a structured knowledge map of this entire literature.
Format:
- Central claim the field orbits around
- 3-5 supporting pillars (well-established sub-claims)
- 2-3 contested zones (active debates)
- 1-2 frontier questions (nobody's solved yet)
- 3 papers a newcomer MUST read first and why
Output as a clean outline, not prose."
Print this. Pin it above your desk.
8. PROMPT 8 - The "So What" Test
Run this last. Every time.
"Pretend I have to explain this entire body of research to a
smart non-expert in 5 minutes.
Give me:
1. The one-sentence version of what this field has proven
2. The one honest admission of what it still doesn't know
3. The single real-world implication that matters most
No jargon. No hedging. No academic throat-clearing."
9. PROMPT 9 - The Assumption Killer
"List every assumption that the MAJORITY of these papers share
but never explicitly test or justify.
For each assumption:
- State it clearly
- Name 1-2 papers that rely on it most
- Explain what would happen to the field if the assumption
turned out to be wrong"
This is how paradigm-shifting papers get written.
Сохраняем.
будь в тренде
